Written by Adele Hug, Specialist Oncology Dietitian. Peer Reviewed by Harriet Smith, RD. Claire James, RD. & Gemma Fry, RD.
By the end of this article, you should:
Be aware of signs and symptoms, diagnosis and treatment options for patients with cancer
Understand the physical, psychological and nutritional impact of cancer on a patient
Be aware of nutritional strategies used with patients with cancer
The term ‘cancer’ refers to a group of diseases that occur when abnormal cells divide in an uncontrolled way (1). Cancer can occur in almost any tissue type due to its ability to grow and invade healthy tissue. It can also spread to other parts of the body in a process known as metastasis. There are over 200 types of cancer and these include carcinomas, lymphomas, leukaemias, sarcomas and brain/spinal tumours.
One in two people will develop cancer within their lifetime (2). In 2018, an estimated 9.6 million deaths were attributed to cancer, making it the second leading cause of death worldwide (1). In the UK, there were 2.5 million people living with cancer in 2015, and this is estimated to rise to four million by 2030 (3). The majority of cases are in older adults (aged over 65) and this is expected to treble by 2040 (4). This older cohort of cancer patients are prone to numerous comorbidities.
Signs and Symptoms
The signs and symptoms of cancer are extremely broad. Many of the signs and symptoms overlap with other conditions and diseases, which can cause delays in cancer diagnosis. Different types of cancers have specific signs and symptoms.
Generally-speaking, common signs and symptoms of cancers may include (5,6):
Pyrexia (raised temperature)
Cough, breathing problems or voice changes
Breast, nipple or chest changes
Unexplained weight changes
Fatigue and tiredness
Skin changes, lumps or swellings
Melena (black, tarry stools)
Reflux and indigestion
Bloating, distention, obstruction
Bleeding or bruising problems
Haematuria (blood in urine)
Haemoptysis (coughing up blood)
Vaginal bleeding (post-menopausal bleeding or bleeding after sex)
Screening aims to identify a disease in asymptomatic individuals within a population (7). Population screening remains controversial due to the possibilities of overdiagnosis and therefore overtreatment. It is continuously evaluated to ensure that the benefits outweigh these risks. In the UK, there are government-led population-wide cancer screening programmes for bowel cancer, breast cancer and cervical cancer. Additionally, high-risk groups or individuals may be referred for screening for certain cancers such as lung cancer (8) or prostate cancer (9).
A cancer diagnosis is often made using a combination of diagnostic tools. This may include scans (such as computerised tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans), investigative procedures (such as endoscopy or colonoscopy) and biochemical tests. Detecting specific genetic mutations and tumour-specific receptor expressions are now part of diagnostics to determine if a targeted cancer treatment could be used.
The cancer is commonly classified and staged using the Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) classification (10). This is a globally recognised system for classifying the extent of spread of cancer. The TNM classification system may be used alongside tumour receptors or genetic testing to give an overall clinical picture, predict prognosis and determine the best treatment protocol. Early diagnosis is a key factor in cancer survival (11) and delays in diagnosis could be a reason for UK cancer survival rates lagging behind other European countries (12).
Cancer treatments can be used alone or as a combination. Common treatments may include:
Stem cell and bone marrow transplants
The Impact of Cancer
The disease itself and its associated treatments can greatly affect the lives of the patient and their carers. This section will explore the physical, psychological and nutritional impacts of cancer.
Common effects of cancer include biochemical changes (such as anaemia and raised bilirubin), anatomical changes (such as a stoma formation or a mastectomy) and physiological changes (such as sexual dysfunction and fatigue). These physical changes can have a significant impact on a patient’s mental health and body image too.
Cancer treatments can also cause long-term side effects (sometimes referred to as ‘late effects of cancer treatment’). For example, in the long-term, treatments like radiotherapy, systemic anti-cancer treatments (SACT) such as chemotherapy or immunotherapy and hormone therapies can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, secondary primary cancer, chronic fatigue, pain, urinary or gastrointestinal problems (13).
The uncertainty surrounding a cancer diagnosis and its treatment can cause a range of psychosocial issues. Cancer patients report isolation, depression, anxiety and body image issues (14,15). Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, many cancer patients are needing to self-isolate or shield, which could be a cause of additional stress and anxiety, although the long-term impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on cancer patients is largely unknown (16).
All of the above can affect a patient’s nutritional status. At diagnosis, some patients may present with signs and symptoms that affect their nutritional status (such as dysphagia, reflux or poor appetite). These are referred to as ‘nutrition-impact symptoms’ (NIS). Other cancer patients may feel relatively well at diagnosis but their cancer treatments (such as SACT and radiotherapy) may cause new NIS.
The prevalence of malnutrition in cancer patients is highly variable. Recent studies suggest that the prevalence is around 51% to 71% (17,18). Malnutrition in cancer patients is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, decreased treatment tolerance and quality of life and increased hospital admissions (19,20).
Cancer cachexia is a complex and progressive syndrome of systemic inflammation and catabolic alterations. It is characterised by the loss of skeletal muscle mass, with or without loss of fat mass, in those with cancer. It can lead to decreased physical activity, adverse psychological side effects, poor performance status and higher mortality rates (21).
Cancer cachexia is defined by the percentage weight loss from usual body weight. Specifically, a weight loss greater than 5% or weight loss greater than 2% in individuals with a Body Mass Index (BMI) <20 kg/m2 or skeletal muscle mass loss (22). This skeletal muscle mass loss and decline in functional status is known as sarcopenia.
Nutrition Risk Screening
The prevalence of cancer is increasing and it has a significant effect on a cancer patient’s nutritional status. Oncology dietetic services must prioritise those requiring dietetic support and therefore it is important to identify these patients through regular nutrition risk screening. Early nutrition and dietetic interventions are crucial for supporting improved patient outcomes.
Recent European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) guidelines suggest that nutritional risk screening should be performed at the time of a cancer diagnosis, however there is a low level of evidence to support this recommendation (23). Numerous screening tools have been developed and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is considered a gold-standard nutrition risk screening tool in oncology, with the added benefit of reporting the presence of NIS (24). Currently, there are a lack of screening tools which assess cachexia, sarcopenia and malnutrition at once (25).
In recent years, prehabilitation (prehab) has been incorporated into cancer treatment pathways. Prehab is a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach for pre-treatment health optimisation which addresses fitness levels, nutritional status and mental health status. It is increasingly recognised that health optimisation prior to commencing cancer treatments can improve outcomes, including nutritional status, mental health and long-term health (26).
Whilst the use of prehab is more established in surgical patients 27, an appropriate personalised programme is recommended for all cancer patients ongoing any treatment, including those undergoing systemic anti-cancer therapies (SACT) or those on a palliative treatment pathway who have an incurable but treatable cancer (26). Prehab can form part of established dietetic services or it may be offered as a standalone service.
Whilst some studies have suggested that energy requirements may increase for cancer patients, ESPEN assume similar energy requirements to healthy individuals; however they do recommend slightly higher protein requirements at 1-1.5g protein/kg/day (23). This, coupled with a possible decreased oral intake, reiterates the importance of nutrition support from Registered Dietitians.
Prevent treatment delays due to nutritional issues
Enhance quality of life whilst upholding a patient’s cultural beliefs.
An individualised and person-centred approach is key (28). A food-first approach is prioritised in patients who are able to eat and drink orally (29). This approach may involve:
Offering food ‘little but often’ in smaller portions
Food fortification with high energy/protein options
Offering favourite foods and preferred flavours
Encouraging consumption of nourishing drinks between meals
Offering encouragement and support
However, if patients are struggling to meet their nutritional requirements through an oral diet alone and/or if the patient has or is at risk of malnutrition, they may be prescribed oral nutritional supplements (ONS). Some patients are unable to eat and drink orally and therefore nutrition may be delivered via the enteral route or via the parenteral route to supplement or provide full nutrition requirements when appropriate (30).
Dietitians play key roles in multidisciplinary care teams. They serve as advocates for their patient’s nutritional needs throughout their cancer journey. For example, head and neck patients should receive dietetic support and advice from dietitians regarding the best enteral feeding routes to meet their nutritional requirements during chemoradiotherapy (31,32).
Texture and Fibre Modification
Patients may need a texture modified diet due to the disease and/or treatment causing symptoms (i.e. dysphagia) which make safe swallowing more difficult. Texture and fibre modified diets are often used for the management of inoperable malignant bowel obstruction (MBO), although the evidence base for this is limited (33). There is an ongoing clinical trial looking at the use of an elemental diet (ONS consisting of amino acids, fatty acids, sugars, vitamins and minerals that require no digestion) in patients with ovarian MBO (34). The types of dietary fibres consumed may also be manipulated for bowel management; for example, patients with an ileostomy may be counselled to follow a low insoluble fibre diet (35).
Appropriate symptom management forms a crucial part of dietetic treatment for oncology patients. Table 1 provides an overview of the causes and management strategies for Nutrition Impact Symptoms (NIS) in cancer.
Table 1: The causes and management strategies for Nutrition Impact Symptoms (NIS) in cancer (36,37)
Nutritional strategies (in addition to dietetic counselling)
Traditional “diabetes diet” usually not appropriate in these cases
Carbohydrate awareness may help
Appropriate guidance on hypoglycemia management if at risk
Treat cause (if able)
Pain relief before meals if pain with eating/drinking
Pain itself can cause anorexia so reassure patient adequate pain control can improve intake
Depression and/or anxiety
Realistic nutrition goals
Self-care through eating and drinking
Optimise intake to meet person-specific needs
End of Life Nutritional Care
Patients with refractory cachexia are only able to make limited improvements to their physical health and nutritional status. As a patient nears the end of their life, the aims of nutrition support may change to ensure optimal quality of life. The dietitian plays an important role in helping to advise on appropriate dietary strategies. Early discussions with the patient, their carers and the MDT are crucial for appropriate person-centred nutritional care (44).
When patients are undergoing cancer treatment, nutrition can often feel like the only thing that they have control over. However, it is important to regnosie that, whilst important, nutrition alone cannot cure cancer. Some patients may choose to reject conventional cancer treatment and nutritional support in favour of alternative and non evidence-based dietary and treatment approaches. This has been associated with an increased risk of death (45), so it is important that all healthcare professionals (including dietitians) are empathetic and explore their patient’s belief system when discussing appropriate nutrition support.
Maddams J, Utley M, Møller H. Projections of cancer prevalence in the United Kingdom, 2010-2040. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(7):1195–202.
Koo MM, Swann R, McPhail S, Abel GA, Elliss-Brookes L, Rubin GP, et al. Presenting symptoms of cancer and stage at diagnosis: evidence from a cross-sectional, population-based study. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2020;21(1):73–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30595-9
Fingeret MC, Teo I, Epner DE. Managing body image difficulties of adult cancer patients: Lessons from available research. Cancer [Internet]. 2014 Mar 1;120(5):633–41. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/cncr.28469
Tsamakis K, Gavriatopoulou M, Schizas D, Stravodimou A, Mougkou A, Tsiptsios D, et al. Oncology during the COVID‑19 pandemic: challenges, dilemmas and the psychosocial impact on cancer patients (Review). Oncol Lett [Internet]. 2020 May 8; Available from: http://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ol.2020.11599
Shaw C, Fleuret C, Pickard JM, Mohammed K, Black G, Wedlake L. Comparison of a novel, simple nutrition screening tool for adult oncology inpatients and the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) against the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA). Support Care Cancer [Internet]. 2015 Jan 20;23(1):47–54. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-014-2319-8
Kiss N, Isenring E, Gough K, Krishnasamy M. The prevalence of weight loss during (chemo)radiotherapy treatment for lung cancer and associated patient- and treatment-related factors. Clin Nutr [Internet]. 2014;33(6):1074–80. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24325888
Vanhoutte G, van de Wiel M, Wouters K, Sels M, Bartolomeeussen L, De Keersmaecker S, et al. Cachexia in cancer: what is in the definition? BMJ open Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2016;3(1):e000097. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843571
Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: An international consensus. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2011;12(5):489–95. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7
Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, Barthelemy N, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2017;
Miller J, Wells L, Nwulu U, Currow D, Johnson MJ, Skipworth RJE. Validated screening tools for the assessment of cachexia, sarcopenia, and malnutrition: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr [Internet]. 2018 Dec 1;108(6):1196–208. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/108/6/1196/5239935
Sivananth T, Quinn M, Stortz R-A, Palma DA, Francis P, Kuruvilla S, et al. Proactive versus reactive feeding tube (FT) placement in head and neck cancer patients (HNC pts) receiving chemoradiation (CRT). J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2019 Nov 1;37(31_suppl):11–11. Available from: http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.31_suppl.11
Eldridge L, Farrer K, Gillespie L, Bower J, Shaw C, Committee B. Top Tips for the Oral / enteral Nutrition and Home Parenteral Support for Patients with Small Bowel Obstruction due to Advanced Malignancy during the COVID-19 Pandemic [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.bapen.org.uk/pdfs/bifa/bifa-top-tips-series-11.pdf
Michael A, Smith E, Hug A, Kilpatrick T. EDMONd: A feasibility study of elemental diet as an alternative to parenteral nutrition for ovarian cancer patients with inoperable malignant bowel obstruction. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2018 May 20;36(15_suppl):TPS5605–TPS5605. Available from: http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.TPS5605
Mitchell A, et al. Dietary management for people with an ileostomy: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth [Internet]. 2021 May [cited 2022 Apr 21];19(9):2188-2306. DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00377 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34054034/
Rehwaldt M, Wickham R, Purl S, Tariman J, Blendowski C, Shott S, et al. Self-care strategies to cope with taste changes after chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum [Internet]. 2009 Mar;36(2):E47-56. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19273394
Powell N, Ibraheim H, Raine T, Speight RA, Papa S, Brain O, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology endorsed guidance for the management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2020 Jul;5(7):679–97. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468125320300145
Wedlake L, Shaw C, McNair H, Lalji A, Mohammed K, Klopper T, et al. Randomized controlled trial of dietary fiber for the prevention of radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity during pelvic radiotherapy. Am J Clin Nutr [Internet]. 2017 Jul 5;ajcn150565. Available from: http://ajcn.nutrition.org/lookup/doi/10.3945/ajcn.116.150565
Österlund P, Ruotsalainen T, Peuhkuri K, Korpela R, Ollus A, Ikonen M, et al. Lactose intolerance associated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2004 Aug;2(8):696–703. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1542356504002939